↓ Skip to main content

Making sense of handwritten signs in public spaces

Overview of attention for article published in Social Semiotics, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Making sense of handwritten signs in public spaces
Published in
Social Semiotics, August 2020
DOI 10.1080/10350330.2020.1810549
Authors

Li Wei, Zhu Hua

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 6 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 10 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 8 28%
Social Sciences 4 14%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 10 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2022.
All research outputs
#16,289,619
of 24,769,082 outputs
Outputs from Social Semiotics
#203
of 326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,444
of 404,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Semiotics
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,769,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.