↓ Skip to main content

Lumbar foraminal stenosis, the hidden stenosis including at L5/S1

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Lumbar foraminal stenosis, the hidden stenosis including at L5/S1
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00590-016-1806-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sumihisa Orita, Kazuhide Inage, Yawara Eguchi, Go Kubota, Yasuchika Aoki, Junichi Nakamura, Yusuke Matsuura, Takeo Furuya, Masao Koda, Seiji Ohtori

Abstract

In patients with lower back and leg pain, lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) is one of the most important pathologies, especially for predominant radicular symptoms. LFS pathology can develop as a result of progressing spinal degeneration and is characterized by exacerbation with foraminal narrowing caused by lumbar extension (Kemp's sign). However, there is a lack of critical clinical findings for LFS pathology. Therefore, patients with robust and persistent leg pain, which is exacerbated by lumbar extension, should be suspected of LFS. Radiological diagnosis is performed using multiple radiological modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging, including plain examination and novel protocols such as diffusion tensor imaging, as well as dynamic X-ray, and computed tomography. Electrophysiological testing can also aid diagnosis. Treatment options include both conservative and surgical approaches. Conservative treatment includes medication, rehabilitation, and spinal nerve block. Surgery should be considered when the pathology is refractory to conservative treatment and requires direct decompression of the exiting nerve root, including the dorsal root ganglia. In cases with decreased intervertebral height and/or instability, fusion surgery should also be considered. Recent advancements in minimally invasive lumbar lateral interbody fusion procedures enable effective and less invasive foraminal enlargement compared with traditional fusion surgeries such as transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. The lumbosacral junction can cause L5 radiculopathy with greater incidence than other lumbar levels as a result of anatomical and epidemiological factors, which should be better addressed when treating clinical lower back pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 19 14%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Student > Master 8 6%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 47 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 52 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2019.
All research outputs
#14,146,941
of 23,914,147 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#266
of 911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,839
of 358,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,914,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 911 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.