You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Longitudinal cohort protocol study of oropharyngeal dysphagia: relationships to gross motor attainment, growth and nutritional status in preschool children with cerebral palsy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001460 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katherine A Benfer, Kelly A Weir, Kristie L Bell, Robert S Ware, Peter S W Davies, Roslyn N Boyd |
| Abstract |
The prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD) in children with cerebral palsy (CP) is estimated to be between 19% and 99%. OPD can impact on children's growth, nutrition and overall health. Despite the growing recognition of the extent and significance of health issues relating to OPD in children with CP, lack of knowledge of its profile in this subpopulation remains. This study aims to investigate the relationship between OPD, attainment of gross motor skills, growth and nutritional status in young children with CP at and between two crucial age points, 18-24 and 36 months, corrected age. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 149 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 19% |
| Researcher | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 23% |
| Unknown | 40 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 45 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2012.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#23,742
of 25,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,912
of 185,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#166
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.