↓ Skip to main content

Tract-specific quantitative MRI better correlates with disability than conventional MRI in multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Tract-specific quantitative MRI better correlates with disability than conventional MRI in multiple sclerosis
Published in
Journal of Neurology, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00415-012-6638-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel M. Harrison, Navid Shiee, Pierre-Louis Bazin, Scott D. Newsome, John N. Ratchford, Dzung Pham, Peter A. Calabresi, Daniel S. Reich

Abstract

Although diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and the magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) have been extensively studied in multiple sclerosis (MS), it is still unclear if they are more effective biomarkers of disability than conventional MRI. MRI scans were performed on 117 participants with MS in addition to 26 healthy volunteers. Mean values were obtained for DTI indices and MTR for supratentorial brain and three white matter tracts of interest. DTI and MTR values were tested for correlations with measures of atrophy and lesion volume and were compared with these more conventional indices for prediction of disability. All DTI and MTR values correlated to an equivalent degree with lesion volume and cerebral volume fraction (CVF). Thalamic volumes correlated with all indices in the optic radiations and with mean and perpendicular diffusivity in the corpus callosum. Nested model regression analysis demonstrated that, compared with CVF, DTI indices in the optic radiations were more strongly correlated with Expanded Disability Status Scale and were also more strongly correlated than both CVF and lesion volume with low-contrast visual acuity. Abnormalities in DTI and MTR are equivalently linked with brain atrophy and inflammatory lesion burden, suggesting that for practical purposes they are markers of multiple aspects of MS pathology. Our findings that some DTI and MTR indices are more strongly linked with disability than conventional MRI measures justifies their potential use as targeted, functional system-specific clinical trial outcomes in MS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Austria 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 65 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 18 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 24%
Psychology 5 7%
Engineering 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 17 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2012.
All research outputs
#14,730,916
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,086
of 4,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,397
of 167,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#28
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.