Title |
Impact of the treatment-free interval on health-related quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma: a UK cross-sectional survey
|
---|---|
Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00520-012-1548-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
S. Acaster, S. Gaugris, G. Velikova, K. Yong, A. J. Lloyd |
Abstract |
While the impact of various treatments on myeloma patients' health-related quality of life (HRQL) has been reported, the impact of a treatment-free interval (TFI) is currently unclear. The aims of this study were to assess if (1) a TFI is associated with a better HRQL vs. other treatment phases and (2) the length of the TFI influences HRQL. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 68 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 24% |
Other | 13 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 15 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 33% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 14% |
Unknown | 18 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,727,241
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#838
of 4,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,988
of 167,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.