| Title |
Fast reduction of undersampling artifacts in radial MR angiography with 3D total variation on graphics hardware
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10334-010-0207-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Florian Knoll, Markus Unger, Clemens Diwoky, Christian Clason, Thomas Pock, Rudolf Stollberger |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 35% |
| Researcher | 10 | 20% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 16 | 33% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,866,480
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine
#149
of 492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,774
of 97,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 492 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.