| Title |
Saliva or Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens for Detection of SARS-CoV-2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmc2016359 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne L Wyllie, John Fournier, Arnau Casanovas-Massana, Melissa Campbell, Maria Tokuyama, Pavithra Vijayakumar, Joshua L Warren, Bertie Geng, M Catherine Muenker, Adam J Moore, Chantal B F Vogels, Mary E Petrone, Isabel M Ott, Peiwen Lu, Arvind Venkataraman, Alice Lu-Culligan, Jonathan Klein, Rebecca Earnest, Michael Simonov, Rupak Datta, Ryan Handoko, Nida Naushad, Lorenzo R Sewanan, Jordan Valdez, Elizabeth B White, Sarah Lapidus, Chaney C Kalinich, Xiaodong Jiang, Daniel J Kim, Eriko Kudo, Melissa Linehan, Tianyang Mao, Miyu Moriyama, Ji E Oh, Annsea Park, Julio Silva, Eric Song, Takehiro Takahashi, Manabu Taura, Orr-El Weizman, Patrick Wong, Yexin Yang, Santos Bermejo, Camila D Odio, Saad B Omer, Charles S Dela Cruz, Shelli Farhadian, Richard A Martinello, Akiko Iwasaki, Nathan D Grubaugh, Albert I Ko |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,259 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 343 | 11% |
| United States | 268 | 8% |
| France | 187 | 6% |
| Japan | 129 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 69 | 2% |
| Canada | 47 | 1% |
| Colombia | 43 | 1% |
| India | 34 | 1% |
| Mexico | 31 | <1% |
| Other | 423 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1685 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2708 | 83% |
| Scientists | 321 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 182 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 46 | 1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 616 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 616 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 94 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 67 | 11% |
| Other | 55 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 8% |
| Other | 106 | 17% |
| Unknown | 198 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 124 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 76 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 32 | 5% |
| Engineering | 18 | 3% |
| Other | 87 | 14% |
| Unknown | 237 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2805. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,524
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#174
of 32,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162
of 426,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#16
of 315 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 315 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.