↓ Skip to main content

Sexually transmitted bacteria affect female cloacal assemblages in a wild bird

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology Letters, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sexually transmitted bacteria affect female cloacal assemblages in a wild bird
Published in
Ecology Letters, October 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01542.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joël White, Pascal Mirleau, Etienne Danchin, Hervé Mulard, Scott A. Hatch, Philipp Heeb, Richard H. Wagner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 143 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 22%
Researcher 28 18%
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 16 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 97 64%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Environmental Science 7 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 25 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2020.
All research outputs
#19,406,195
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#2,946
of 3,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,473
of 103,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#25
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.