You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Constitutive Formation of Caveolae in a Bacterium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.042 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Piers J. Walser, Nicholas Ariotti, Mark Howes, Charles Ferguson, Richard Webb, Dominik Schwudke, Natalya Leneva, Kwang-Jin Cho, Leanne Cooper, James Rae, Matthias Floetenmeyer, Viola M.J. Oorschot, Ulf Skoglund, Kai Simons, John F. Hancock, Robert G. Parton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 44% |
| Saint Lucia | 1 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Japan | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 172 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 45 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 24% |
| Professor | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 89 | 49% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 40 | 22% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 4% |
| Engineering | 7 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,445,918
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#6,174
of 17,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,529
of 179,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#60
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.