↓ Skip to main content

Cellulose nanofibrils as filler for adhesives: effect on specific fracture energy of solid wood-adhesive bonds

Overview of attention for article published in Cellulose, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Title
Cellulose nanofibrils as filler for adhesives: effect on specific fracture energy of solid wood-adhesive bonds
Published in
Cellulose, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10570-011-9576-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Veigel, Ulrich Müller, Jozef Keckes, Michael Obersriebnig, Wolfgang Gindl-Altmutter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Serbia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 110 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 20%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Master 13 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 25 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 30 27%
Engineering 18 16%
Chemistry 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 37 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,485,442
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Cellulose
#247
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,918
of 117,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellulose
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.