↓ Skip to main content

Nile Delta vegetation response to Holocene climate variability

Overview of attention for article published in Geology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nile Delta vegetation response to Holocene climate variability
Published in
Geology, July 2012
DOI 10.1130/g33012.1
Authors

Christopher E. Bernhardt, Benjamin P. Horton, Jean-Daniel Stanley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
France 1 1%
Panama 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 83 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 21%
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 45 49%
Environmental Science 13 14%
Arts and Humanities 8 9%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 15 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2012.
All research outputs
#2,401,290
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Geology
#1,679
of 4,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,722
of 176,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geology
#17
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.