↓ Skip to main content

Nanostructured Metal‐Free Electrochemical Catalysts for Highly Efficient Oxygen Reduction

Overview of attention for article published in Small, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
569 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nanostructured Metal‐Free Electrochemical Catalysts for Highly Efficient Oxygen Reduction
Published in
Small, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/smll.201200861
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yao Zheng, Yan Jiao, Mietek Jaroniec, Yonggang Jin, Shi Zhang Qiao

Abstract

Replacing precious and nondurable Pt catalysts with cheap and commercially available materials to facilitate sluggish cathodic oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is a key issue in the development of fuel cell technology. The recently developed cost effective and highly stable metal-free catalysts reveal comparable catalytic activity and significantly better fuel tolerance than that of current Pt-based catalysts; therefore, they can serve as feasible Pt alternatives for the next generation of ORR electrocatalysts. Their promising electrocatalytic properties and acceptable costs greatly promote the R&D of fuel cell technology. This review provides an overview of recent advances in state-of-the-art nanostructured metal-free electrocatalysts including nitrogen-doped carbons, graphitic-carbon nitride (g-C(3) N(4) )-based hybrids, and 2D graphene-based materials. A special emphasis is placed on the molecular design of these electrocatalysts, origin of their electrochemical reactivity, and ORR pathways. Finally, some perspectives are highlighted on the development of more efficient ORR electrocatalysts featuring high stability, low cost, and enhanced performance, which are the key factors to accelerate the commercialization of fuel cell technology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
China 2 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 259 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 23%
Researcher 43 16%
Student > Master 30 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 49 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 112 42%
Materials Science 39 15%
Chemical Engineering 19 7%
Engineering 16 6%
Physics and Astronomy 10 4%
Other 11 4%
Unknown 60 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2014.
All research outputs
#19,311,402
of 24,586,986 outputs
Outputs from Small
#5,487
of 7,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,235
of 173,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Small
#63
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,586,986 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.