↓ Skip to main content

Vestibular function following unilateral cochlear implantation for profound sensorineural hearing loss

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Vestibular function following unilateral cochlear implantation for profound sensorineural hearing loss
Published in
Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40463-016-0150-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gavin J. le Nobel, Euna Hwang, Adrian Wu, Sharon Cushing, Vincent Y. Lin

Abstract

Many Canadians are affected by sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and those with severe or profound hearing loss may have poor hearing function despite optimized hearing aids. Cochlear implants (CI) offer effective hearing rehabilitation for these patients, however, concern continues to exist regarding possible effects of CI on the vestibular system and balance. The objective of this study was to conduct a pilot study assessing the effects of unilateral cochlear implantation (CI) on balance and the vestibular system in post-lingually deafened adults. Twelve patients were included in this pilot study and were assessed pre-operatively and at immediate, 1 week, and 1 month post-operative intervals. Assessments consisted of the dizziness handicap inventory (DHI), subjective visual vertical (SVV), and timed up-and-go testing (TUG). When applicable, testing was repeated with the CI on and off. Many patients were found to have deviated SVV at pre-operative and post-operative assessments. However, statistically significant changes were not seen when comparing pre-operative and post-operative SVV or when comparing SVV with the CI on and with the CI off. DHI was found to improve in five patients and worsen in two patients, however, no statistically significant change was found in DHI scores or with TUG testing. This current pilot study does not indicate that CI surgery or implant activity influence vestibular or balance function, however, this pilot study is underpowered and greater numbers of patients would need be assessed to confirm these findings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 24 24%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Master 10 10%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 26%
Unspecified 24 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 25 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2016.
All research outputs
#17,348,622
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery
#321
of 629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,585
of 368,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.