| Title |
Timing of Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Administration in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.053 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giuseppe Tarantini, Marco Mojoli, Ferdinando Varbella, Roberto Caporale, Stefano Rigattieri, Giuseppe Andò, Plinio Cirillo, Simona Pierini, Andrea Santarelli, Paolo Sganzerla, Luisa Cacciavillani, Luciano Babuin, Nicoletta De Cesare, Ugo Limbruno, Alberto Massoni, Andrea Rognoni, Daniela Pavan, Flavia Belloni, Carlo Cernetti, Luca Favero, Francesco Saia, Luca Nai Fovino, Giulia Masiero, Loris Roncon, Valeria Gasparetto, Marco Ferlini, Federico Ronco, Roberta Rossini, Paolo Canova, Daniela Trabattoni, Alessandra Russo, Vincenzo Guiducci, Carlo Penzo, Fabio Tarantino, Ciro Mauro, Elena Corrada, Giovanni Esposito, Alfredo Marchese, Sergio Berti, Matteo Martinato, Danila Azzolina, Dario Gregori, Dominick J. Angiolillo, Giuseppe Musumeci, DUBIUS Investigators, Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 19% |
| Italy | 9 | 10% |
| Spain | 8 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 6% |
| Germany | 4 | 4% |
| Argentina | 3 | 3% |
| Mexico | 3 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Israel | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 22 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 54 | 57% |
| Scientists | 22 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 21% |
| Unknown | 35 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 34% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 47 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2021.
All research outputs
#581,590
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,478
of 16,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,153
of 426,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#44
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.