↓ Skip to main content

都市部の救命救急センターに搬送されたアナフィラキシー症例の検討

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 185)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
都市部の救命救急センターに搬送されたアナフィラキシー症例の検討
Published in
Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine, August 2020
DOI 10.11240/jsem.23.525
Authors

小林 知子, 伊藤 友章, 三浦 太郎, 河島 尚志, 坪井 良治, 大久保 ゆかり, 三島 史朗, 織田 順

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2020.
All research outputs
#14,795,067
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine
#47
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,364
of 426,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.