You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Mechanisms of “Incidental News Consumption”: an Eye Tracking Study of News Interaction on Facebook
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Digital Journalism, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1080/21670811.2020.1813047 |
| Authors |
Adrián Vergara, Ignacio Siles, Ana Claudia Castro, Alonso Chaves |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 13 | 30% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 9% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,682,664
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Digital Journalism
#386
of 928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,126
of 425,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digital Journalism
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.