↓ Skip to main content

歯科疾患実態調査の協力率に関する検討:平成23年歯科疾患実態調査の協力者は大半が国民健康・栄養調査における血液検査の協力者であった

Overview of attention for article published in [Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
歯科疾患実態調査の協力率に関する検討:平成23年歯科疾患実態調査の協力者は大半が国民健康・栄養調査における血液検査の協力者であった
Published in
[Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health, January 2016
DOI 10.11236/jph.63.6_319
Pubmed ID
Authors

安藤 雄一, 青山 旬, 尾崎 哲則, 三浦 宏子, 柳澤 智仁, 石濱 信之

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2020.
All research outputs
#16,051,091
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from [Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health
#117
of 451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,311
of 399,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from [Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.