↓ Skip to main content

経営学者と実践家との関係性の再考

Overview of attention for article published in Transactions of the Academic Association for Organizational Science, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
経営学者と実践家との関係性の再考
Published in
Transactions of the Academic Association for Organizational Science, July 2013
DOI 10.11207/taaos.2.1_113
Authors

服部 泰宏, 伊達 洋駆, 福澤 光啓, 舘野 泰一, 安斎 勇樹

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2020.
All research outputs
#17,350,971
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Transactions of the Academic Association for Organizational Science
#7
of 22 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,160
of 206,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transactions of the Academic Association for Organizational Science
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one scored the same or higher as 15 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them