| Title |
Implementation, reliability testing, and compliance monitoring of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit in trauma patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-008-1031-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stacie L. Soja, Pratik P. Pandharipande, Sloan B. Fleming, Bryan A. Cotton, Leanna R. Miller, Stefanija G. Weaver, Byron T. Lee, E. Wesley Ely |
| Abstract |
To implement delirium monitoring, test reliability, and monitor compliance of performing the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) in trauma patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 37 | 31% |
| Unknown | 22 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 53% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2012.
All research outputs
#18,313,878
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#4,415
of 4,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,632
of 79,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#23
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.