You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Coevolution of Networks and Beliefs in U.S. Environmental Risk Policy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Policy Studies Journal, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/psj.12407 |
| Authors |
Adam Douglas Henry, Thomas Dietz, Robin L. Sweeney |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 19% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 4% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 14 | 54% |
| Members of the public | 10 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 18% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 18% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,633,269
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Policy Studies Journal
#130
of 747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,354
of 427,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Policy Studies Journal
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.