↓ Skip to main content

Ovarian Cancer Risk Factors by Histologic Subtype: An Analysis From the Ovarian Cancer Cohort Consortium

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
361 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
419 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ovarian Cancer Risk Factors by Histologic Subtype: An Analysis From the Ovarian Cancer Cohort Consortium
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, June 2016
DOI 10.1200/jco.2016.66.8178
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Wentzensen, Elizabeth M Poole, Britton Trabert, Emily White, Alan A Arslan, Alpa V Patel, V Wendy Setiawan, Kala Visvanathan, Elisabete Weiderpass, Hans-Olov Adami, Amanda Black, Leslie Bernstein, Louise A Brinton, Julie Buring, Lesley M Butler, Saioa Chamosa, Tess V Clendenen, Laure Dossus, Renee Fortner, Susan M Gapstur, Mia M Gaudet, Inger T Gram, Patricia Hartge, Judith Hoffman-Bolton, Annika Idahl, Michael Jones, Rudolf Kaaks, Victoria Kirsh, Woon-Puay Koh, James V Lacey, I-Min Lee, Eva Lundin, Melissa A Merritt, N Charlotte Onland-Moret, Ulrike Peters, Jenny N Poynter, Sabina Rinaldi, Kim Robien, Thomas Rohan, Dale P Sandler, Catherine Schairer, Leo J Schouten, Louise K Sjöholm, Sabina Sieri, Anthony Swerdlow, Anna Tjonneland, Ruth Travis, Antonia Trichopoulou, Piet A van den Brandt, Lynne Wilkens, Alicja Wolk, Hannah P Yang, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Shelley S Tworoger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 419 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 417 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 12%
Researcher 46 11%
Student > Bachelor 46 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 5%
Other 65 16%
Unknown 154 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 130 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 2%
Other 34 8%
Unknown 170 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,178,295
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#2,879
of 22,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,095
of 375,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#60
of 359 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 359 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.