You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Suprachiasmatic VIP neurons are required for normal circadian rhythmicity and comprised of molecularly distinct subpopulations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-020-17197-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
William D. Todd, Anne Venner, Christelle Anaclet, Rebecca Y. Broadhurst, Roberto De Luca, Sathyajit S. Bandaru, Lindsay Issokson, Lauren M. Hablitz, Olga Cravetchi, Elda Arrigoni, John N. Campbell, Charles N. Allen, David P. Olson, Patrick M. Fuller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 19% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 41 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 33 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 42 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2020.
All research outputs
#13,220,057
of 23,298,349 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#39,005
of 48,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,742
of 400,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1,311
of 1,544 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,298,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,544 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.