↓ Skip to main content

Physiological Profiles of Elite Judo Athletes

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
344 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
625 Mendeley
Title
Physiological Profiles of Elite Judo Athletes
Published in
Sports Medicine, October 2012
DOI 10.2165/11538580-000000000-00000
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emerson Franchini, Fabrício B. Del Vecchio, Karin A. Matsushigue, Guilherme G. Artioli

Abstract

To be successful in international competitions, judo athletes must achieve an excellent level of physical fitness and physical condition during training. This article reviews the physiological profiles of elite judo athletes from different sex, age and weight categories. Body fat is generally low for these athletes, except for the heavyweight competitors. In general, elite judo athletes presented higher upper body anaerobic power and capacity than non-elite athletes. Lower body dynamic strength seems to provide a distinction between elite and recreational judo players, but not high-level judo players competing for a spot on national teams. Even maximal isometric strength is not a discriminant variable among judo players. However, more studies focusing on isometric strength endurance are warranted. Although aerobic power and capacity are considered relevant to judo performance, the available data do not present differences among judo athletes from different competitive levels. Typical maximal oxygen uptake values are around 50-55 mL/kg/min for male and 40-45 mL/kg/min for female judo athletes. As for other variables, heavyweight competitors presented lower aerobic power values. The typical differences commonly observed between males and females in the general population are also seen in judo athletes when analysing anaerobic power and capacity, aerobic power, and maximal strength and power. However, further research is needed concerning the differences among the seven weight categories in which judo athletes compete.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 625 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Poland 3 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 605 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 116 19%
Student > Master 88 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 10%
Researcher 49 8%
Student > Postgraduate 33 5%
Other 110 18%
Unknown 168 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 313 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 4%
Social Sciences 9 1%
Other 35 6%
Unknown 187 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2024.
All research outputs
#16,378,107
of 25,853,983 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#2,582
of 2,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,683
of 193,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#683
of 832 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,853,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 832 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.