↓ Skip to main content

厚生労働省の「自助・共助・公助」の特異な新解釈 : 問われる研究者の理論的・政策的感度

Overview of attention for article published in Social Policy and Labor Studies, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
厚生労働省の「自助・共助・公助」の特異な新解釈 : 問われる研究者の理論的・政策的感度
Published in
Social Policy and Labor Studies, December 2013
DOI 10.24533/spls.5.2_1
Authors

里見 賢治

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 50%
Other 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 50%
Arts and Humanities 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,862,990
of 25,652,464 outputs
Outputs from Social Policy and Labor Studies
#3
of 49 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,262
of 322,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Policy and Labor Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,652,464 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one scored the same or higher as 46 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them