↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacokinetics of the novel atypical opioid tapentadol following oral and intravenous administration in dogs

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Journal, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pharmacokinetics of the novel atypical opioid tapentadol following oral and intravenous administration in dogs
Published in
Veterinary Journal, July 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.05.019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mario Giorgi, Alon Meizler, Paul C. Mills

Abstract

Tapentadol (TAP) is a novel opioid pain reliever drug with a dual mechanism of action (mu opioid receptor agonist and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor). It is used as an analgesic in humans, but could be of interest for veterinary species if it has a suitable pharmacokinetic profile. Six dogs were randomly assigned to two treatment groups, using an open, single-dose, two-treatment, two-period, and randomised cross-over design. Each subject received TAP at 50 and 200mg by intravenous (IV) and oral route, respectively, with a 1-week wash-out period between administrations. Blood was collected at regular intervals and the plasma concentration of TAP in each sample was measured using a validated HPLC-FL method. After IV administration, concentrations of TAP were detectable in plasma for up to 6h with a half-life in the range 38-68 min. After oral administration, drug absorption was rapid (T(max), time required to reach the maximum concentration of 47.5 min), but its bioavailability was low (4.4%). Some dose-related adverse effects, including salivation and sedation, were observed, particularly following IV administration. In summary, this study showed that TAP may be useful as an analgesic in the dog, but further studies, including in dogs requiring analgesia, are required to confirm efficacy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Researcher 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 14 28%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 32%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 14 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2012.
All research outputs
#15,739,010
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Journal
#1,118
of 2,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,283
of 178,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Journal
#25
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,436 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.