↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide Study Identifies Association between HLA-B∗55:01 and Self-Reported Penicillin Allergy

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Human Genetics, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-wide Study Identifies Association between HLA-B∗55:01 and Self-Reported Penicillin Allergy
Published in
American Journal of Human Genetics, September 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.08.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristi Krebs, Jonas Bovijn, Neil Zheng, Maarja Lepamets, Jenny C. Censin, Tuuli Jürgenson, Dage Särg, Erik Abner, Triin Laisk, Yang Luo, Line Skotte, Frank Geller, Bjarke Feenstra, Wei Wang, Adam Auton, 23andMe Research Team, Michelle Agee, Stella Aslibekyan, Robert K. Bell, Katarzyna Bryc, Sarah K. Clark, Sarah L. Elson, Kipper Fletez-Brant, Pierre Fontanillas, Nicholas A. Furlotte, Pooja M. Gandhi, Karl Heilbron, Barry Hicks, David A. Hinds, Karen E. Huber, Ethan M. Jewett, Yunxuan Jiang, Aaron Kleinman, Keng-Han Lin, Nadia K. Litterman, Marie K. Luff, Jennifer C. McCreight, Matthew H. McIntyre, Kimberly F. McManus, Joanna L. Mountain, Sahar V. Mozaffari, Priyanka Nandakumar, Elizabeth S. Noblin, Carrie A.M. Northover, Jared O’Connell, Aaron A. Petrakovitz, Steven J. Pitts, G. David Poznik, J. Fah Sathirapongsasuti, Anjali J. Shastri, Janie F. Shelton, Suyash Shringarpure, Chao Tian, Joyce Y. Tung, Robert J. Tunney, Vladimir Vacic, Xin Wang, Amir S. Zare, Soumya Raychaudhuri, Tõnu Esko, Andres Metspalu, Sven Laur, Dan M. Roden, Wei-Qi Wei, Michael V. Holmes, Cecilia M. Lindgren, Elizabeth J. Phillips, Reedik Mägi, Lili Milani, João Fadista

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Student > Master 9 12%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 4 5%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 26 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 31 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 123. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2022.
All research outputs
#343,912
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#125
of 6,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,442
of 427,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#3
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.