↓ Skip to main content

An experiment on the impact of transparency on the effectiveness of requirements documents

Overview of attention for article published in Empirical Software Engineering, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
An experiment on the impact of transparency on the effectiveness of requirements documents
Published in
Empirical Software Engineering, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10664-015-9374-8
Authors

Yu-Cheng Tu, Ewan Tempero, Clark Thomborson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 3%
Peru 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Professor 4 11%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 22 61%
Engineering 4 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,334,427
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Software Engineering
#624
of 705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,445
of 255,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Software Engineering
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 705 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.