↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the bibliometric and semantic nature of negative results

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Exploring the bibliometric and semantic nature of negative results
Published in
Scientometrics, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11192-012-0829-z
Authors

Christian Gumpenberger, Juan Gorraiz, Martin Wieland, Ivana Roche, Edgar Schiebel, Dominique Besagni, Claire François

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Malaysia 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 57 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 22%
Librarian 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 19 29%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 17 26%
Computer Science 14 22%
Arts and Humanities 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 13 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2013.
All research outputs
#7,094,231
of 23,907,431 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,218
of 2,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,815
of 170,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,907,431 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.