↓ Skip to main content

Challenges and Directions for the Advancement of Estuarine Ecosystem Science

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Challenges and Directions for the Advancement of Estuarine Ecosystem Science
Published in
Ecosystems, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10021-016-0004-0
Authors

Jeremy M. Testa, W. Michael Kemp, Lora A. Harris, Ryan J. Woodland, Walter R. Boynton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 80 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 21%
Student > Master 13 16%
Professor 4 5%
Other 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 29 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 21 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2016.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#1,208
of 1,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,328
of 375,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#22
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.