You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
PET/CT in Head-neck Malignancies The Implications for Personalized Clinical Practice
|
---|---|
Published in |
PET Clinics, July 2016
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.cpet.2016.02.002 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Heidi R. Wassef, Nevine Hanna, Patrick Colletti |
Abstract |
PET/CT has been shown to help localize head and neck cancers and provide more accurate staging, post-treatment assessment, and restaging than standard imaging. PET/CT detects synchronous and metachronous cancers and sequelae of therapy and provides prognostic information for each patient. Information provided by PET/CT allows for more individualized therapeutic and surveillance plans for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 5 | 19% |
Student > Master | 5 | 19% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 56% |
Computer Science | 2 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PET Clinics
#133
of 269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,605
of 367,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PET Clinics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 269 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them