You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Supporting the detection of patient deterioration: Observation chart design affects the recognition of abnormal vital signs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Resuscitation, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.02.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Megan H.W. Preece, Andrew Hill, Mark S. Horswill, Marcus O. Watson |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the effect of observation chart design on the ability of health professionals and novice chart users to recognise patient deterioration. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 23% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 17% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2012.
All research outputs
#15,064,611
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Resuscitation
#3,408
of 5,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,100
of 169,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resuscitation
#35
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.