↓ Skip to main content

Approaching the Legitimacy Paradox in Hong Kong: Lessons for Hybrid Regime Courts

Overview of attention for article published in Law & Social Inquiry, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Approaching the Legitimacy Paradox in Hong Kong: Lessons for Hybrid Regime Courts
Published in
Law & Social Inquiry, September 2020
DOI 10.1017/lsi.2020.20
Authors

Julius Yam

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 33%
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Unspecified 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 33%
Unspecified 1 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 11%
Psychology 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,052,774
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Law & Social Inquiry
#70
of 742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,033
of 424,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Law & Social Inquiry
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.