↓ Skip to main content

Why have a special issue on methods used in clinical pharmacy practice research?

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Why have a special issue on methods used in clinical pharmacy practice research?
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11096-016-0326-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy F. Chen, Carmel M. Hughes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Lecturer 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 9 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 16%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 12 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2016.
All research outputs
#18,464,797
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#890
of 1,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,103
of 339,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#19
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.