↓ Skip to main content

Urinary Bisphenol A Concentrations and Implantation Failure among Women Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization

Overview of attention for article published in EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Urinary Bisphenol A Concentrations and Implantation Failure among Women Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization
Published in
EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, April 2012
DOI 10.1289/ehp.1104307
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shelley Ehrlich, Paige L. Williams, Stacey A. Missmer, Jodi A. Flaws, Katharine F. Berry, Antonia M. Calafat, Xiaoyun Ye, John C. Petrozza, Diane Wright, Russ Hauser

Abstract

Bisphenol A (BPA) is a synthetic chemical widely used in the production of polycarbonate plastic and epoxy resins found in numerous consumer products. In experimental animals, BPA increases embryo implantation failure and reduces litter size.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 120 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Student > Master 16 13%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 30 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 7%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 43 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,640,092
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
#1,338
of 8,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,096
of 173,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
#22
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.