↓ Skip to main content

近世実録における中国故事の利用 由井正雪・佐倉惣五郎を例にして

Overview of attention for article published in ASIA CULTURE HISTORY, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
近世実録における中国故事の利用 由井正雪・佐倉惣五郎を例にして
Published in
ASIA CULTURE HISTORY, September 2020
DOI 10.34575/asiach.11.0_112
Authors

荻原 大地

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2020.
All research outputs
#15,179,141
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from ASIA CULTURE HISTORY
#1
of 5 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,862
of 424,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ASIA CULTURE HISTORY
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them