↓ Skip to main content

A novel approach for selecting combination clinical markers of pathology applied to a large retrospective cohort of surgically resected pancreatic cysts

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A novel approach for selecting combination clinical markers of pathology applied to a large retrospective cohort of surgically resected pancreatic cysts
Published in
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, June 2016
DOI 10.1093/jamia/ocw069
Pubmed ID
Authors

David L Masica, Marco Dal Molin, Christopher L Wolfgang, Tyler Tomita, Mohammad R Ostovaneh, Amanda Blackford, Robert A Moran, Joanna K Law, Thomas Barkley, Michael Goggins, Marcia Irene Canto, Meredith Pittman, James R Eshleman, Syed Z Ali, Elliot K Fishman, Ihab R Kamel, Siva P Raman, Atif Zaheer, Nita Ahuja, Martin A Makary, Matthew J Weiss, Kenzo Hirose, John L Cameron, Neda Rezaee, Jin He, Young Joon Ahn, Wenchuan Wu, Yuxuan Wang, Simeon Springer, Luis L Diaz, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Ralph H Hruban, Kenneth W Kinzler, Bert Vogelstein, Rachel Karchin, Anne Marie Lennon

Abstract

Our objective was to develop an approach for selecting combinatorial markers of pathology from diverse clinical data types. We demonstrate this approach on the problem of pancreatic cyst classification. We analyzed 1026 patients with surgically resected pancreatic cysts, comprising 584 intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, 332 serous cystadenomas, 78 mucinous cystic neoplasms, and 42 solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms. To derive optimal markers for cyst classification from the preoperative clinical and radiological data, we developed a statistical approach for combining any number of categorical, dichotomous, or continuous-valued clinical parameters into individual predictors of pathology. The approach is unbiased and statistically rigorous. Millions of feature combinations were tested using 10-fold cross-validation, and the most informative features were validated in an independent cohort of 130 patients with surgically resected pancreatic cysts. We identified combinatorial clinical markers that classified serous cystadenomas with 95% sensitivity and 83% specificity; solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms with 89% sensitivity and 86% specificity; mucinous cystic neoplasms with 91% sensitivity and 83% specificity; and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with 94% sensitivity and 90% specificity. No individual features were as accurate as the combination markers. We further validated these combinatorial markers on an independent cohort of 130 pancreatic cysts, and achieved high and well-balanced accuracies. Overall sensitivity and specificity for identifying patients requiring surgical resection was 84% and 81%, respectively. Our approach identified combinatorial markers for pancreatic cyst classification that had improved performance relative to the individual features they comprise. In principle, this approach can be applied to any clinical dataset comprising dichotomous, categorical, and continuous-valued parameters.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 22%
Other 6 13%
Professor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2016.
All research outputs
#15,379,002
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
#2,635
of 3,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,368
of 353,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
#46
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.