↓ Skip to main content

Pro-cognitive properties of T cells

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Immunology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
205 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
333 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pro-cognitive properties of T cells
Published in
Nature Reviews Immunology, August 2012
DOI 10.1038/nri3280
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Kipnis, Sachin Gadani, Noël C. Derecki

Abstract

Interactions between the central nervous system and the immune system have been studied primarily in the context of pathology, popularizing the view that interplay between these two systems is inherently detrimental. However, recent experimental data have demonstrated productive neuroimmune interactions that occur under normal physiological conditions. In this Essay, we outline our current understanding of contemporary neuroimmunology, describe a working model of T cell function in support of learning and memory, and offer ideas regarding the selective advantages of immune-mediated effects on brain function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Portugal 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 317 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 20%
Researcher 61 18%
Student > Bachelor 46 14%
Student > Master 37 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 8%
Other 60 18%
Unknown 38 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 22%
Neuroscience 72 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 37 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 8%
Other 22 7%
Unknown 60 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,335,858
of 25,157,832 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Immunology
#587
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,531
of 176,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Immunology
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,157,832 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.