You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Pro-cognitive properties of T cells
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Reviews Immunology, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1038/nri3280 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jonathan Kipnis, Sachin Gadani, Noël C. Derecki |
Abstract |
Interactions between the central nervous system and the immune system have been studied primarily in the context of pathology, popularizing the view that interplay between these two systems is inherently detrimental. However, recent experimental data have demonstrated productive neuroimmune interactions that occur under normal physiological conditions. In this Essay, we outline our current understanding of contemporary neuroimmunology, describe a working model of T cell function in support of learning and memory, and offer ideas regarding the selective advantages of immune-mediated effects on brain function. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 27% |
Spain | 2 | 9% |
Canada | 2 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
Zambia | 1 | 5% |
Mexico | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 73% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 18% |
Scientists | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 2% |
Portugal | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 317 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 20% |
Researcher | 61 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 46 | 14% |
Student > Master | 37 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 8% |
Other | 60 | 18% |
Unknown | 38 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 73 | 22% |
Neuroscience | 72 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 12% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 37 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 8% |
Other | 22 | 7% |
Unknown | 60 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,335,858
of 25,157,832 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Immunology
#587
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,531
of 176,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Immunology
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,157,832 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.