| Title |
Comparative Trends in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Japan and the United States, 2013 to 2017
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.037 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Taku Inohara, Shun Kohsaka, John A Spertus, Frederick A Masoudi, John S Rumsfeld, Kevin F Kennedy, Tracy Y Wang, Kyohei Yamaji, Tetsuya Amano, Masato Nakamura |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 15 | 26% |
| United States | 7 | 12% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 33 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 72% |
| Scientists | 9 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 16% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 41% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 27 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#666,429
of 25,904,557 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,706
of 16,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,210
of 427,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#52
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,904,557 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.