| Title |
Definition of T3/4 and Regional Lymph Nodes in Gallbladder Cancer: Which Is More Valid, the UICC or the Japanese Staging System?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-012-2599-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yoji Kishi, Kazuaki Shimada, Shojiro Hata, Seiji Oguro, Yoshihiro Sakamoto, Satoshi Nara, Minoru Esaki, Nobuyoshi Hiraoka, Tomoo Kosuge |
| Abstract |
The Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) and Japanese Society of Biliary Surgery (JSBS) staging systems differ in their staging of gallbladder cancer: they define hepatic invasion with or without invasion of another organ as T3 and either T3 or T4, respectively, and posterosuperior pancreatic lymph node (PSPLN) metastases as M1 and N2, respectively. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 20% |
| Other | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 65% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2012.
All research outputs
#20,165,369
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#5,468
of 6,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,469
of 167,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#60
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.