| Title |
The content and conduct of GP consultations for dermatology problems: a cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x712577 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma Le Roux, Peter J Edwards, Emily Sanderson, Rebecca K Barnes, Matthew J Ridd |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 68% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 64% |
| Scientists | 6 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 26% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,092,707
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#488
of 4,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,483
of 427,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#12
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.