| Title |
Assessment of Brain Injury Using Portable, Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging at the Bedside of Critically Ill Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Neurology, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.3263 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin N. Sheth, Mercy H. Mazurek, Matthew M. Yuen, Bradley A. Cahn, Jill T. Shah, Adrienne Ward, Jennifer A. Kim, Emily J. Gilmore, Guido J. Falcone, Nils Petersen, Kevin T. Gobeske, Firas Kaddouh, David Y. Hwang, Joseph Schindler, Lauren Sansing, Charles Matouk, Jonathan Rothberg, Gordon Sze, Jonathan Siner, Matthew S. Rosen, Serena Spudich, W. Taylor Kimberly |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 745 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 150 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 51 | 7% |
| Turkey | 48 | 6% |
| France | 23 | 3% |
| Spain | 21 | 3% |
| Canada | 17 | 2% |
| Japan | 17 | 2% |
| Australia | 13 | 2% |
| India | 11 | 1% |
| Other | 102 | 14% |
| Unknown | 292 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 508 | 68% |
| Scientists | 150 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 77 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 290 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 53 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 9% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 52 | 18% |
| Unknown | 89 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 26% |
| Neuroscience | 26 | 9% |
| Engineering | 25 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 44 | 15% |
| Unknown | 99 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 823. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2023.
All research outputs
#22,930
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Neurology
#41
of 5,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#958
of 427,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Neurology
#3
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.