↓ Skip to main content

Reduced sperm DNA longevity is associated with an increased incidence of still born; evidence from a multi-ovulating sequential artificial insemination animal model

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Reduced sperm DNA longevity is associated with an increased incidence of still born; evidence from a multi-ovulating sequential artificial insemination animal model
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10815-016-0754-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen D. Johnston, Carmen López-Fernández, Francisca Arroyo, Altea Gosálbez, Elva I. Cortés Gutiérrez, Jose-Luis Fernández, Jaime Gosálvez

Abstract

Using a rabbit model, we assessed the influence of sperm DNA longevity on female reproductive outcomes. Semen was collected from 40 bucks, incubated at 38 °C for 24 h, and the rate of sperm DNA fragmentation (rSDF) was determined using the sperm chromatin dispersion assay. Males were allocated into high rSDF (>0.5 units of increase per hour) or low rSDF (<0.5 units of increase per hour) groups. High and low rSDF semen samples were sequentially artificially inseminated into the same doe to reduce female factor variability, and pregnancy outcomes were recorded. While there was no difference in SDFs between rSDF groups immediately after collection (T0), differences were significant after 2 h of incubation; SDFs determined at collection and rSDF behaved as independent characters (Pearson correlation = 0.099; P = 0.542). Following artificial insemination, the rate of stillborn pups was significantly higher in does inseminated by males with a high rSDF (14/21) compared to those with low rSDF (15/6); (contingency χ(2) 5.19; p = 0.022). The risk of stillborn when low rSDF rabbits were used for insemination was 0.16, but increased to 0.36 when high rSDF animals were used (odds ratio = 2.85; 95 % confidence interval = 1.4-2.7). Dynamic assessment of SDF coupled with natural multiple ovulation, high fecundity of the rabbit and control over female factor influence, provided a useful experimental model to demonstrate the adverse effect of reduced sperm DNA longevity on reproductive outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 19%
Researcher 3 14%
Professor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 24%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2017.
All research outputs
#19,611,252
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#1,199
of 1,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,135
of 359,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#15
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.