| Title |
Proposed criteria for the evaluation of the scientific quality of mandatory rat and mouse feeding trials with whole food/feed derived from genetically modified plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Toxicology, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00204-016-1762-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kerstin Schmidt, Janine Döhring, Christian Kohl, Maria Pla, Esther J. Kok, Debora C. M. Glandorf, René Custers, Hilko van der Voet, Jutta Sharbati, Ralf Einspanier, Dagmar Zeljenková, Jana Tulinská, Armin Spök, Clare Alison, Dieter Schrenk, Annette Pöting, Ralf Wilhelm, Joachim Schiemann, Pablo Steinberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 23% |
| Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,659,172
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#204
of 2,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,912
of 354,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#10
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.