↓ Skip to main content

User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Personalized Network Updates: Increasing Social Interactions and Contributions in Social Networks
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Realistic Simulation of Museum Visitors’ Movements as a Tool for Assessing Sensor-Based User Models
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 GECKOmmender: Personalised Theme and Tour Recommendations for Museums
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Property-Based Interest Propagation in Ontology-Based User Model
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 EEG Estimates of Engagement and Cognitive Workload Predict Math Problem Solving Outcomes
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Preference Relation Based Matrix Factorization for Recommender Systems
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 A Framework for Modeling Trustworthiness of Users in Mobile Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks and Its Validation through Simulated Traffic Flow
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 A Comparative Study of Users’ Microblogging Behavior on Sina Weibo and Twitter
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Modeling Multiple Distributions of Student Performances to Improve Predictive Accuracy
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 A Simple But Effective Method to Incorporate Trusted Neighbors in Recommender Systems
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Exploring Gaze Data for Determining User Learning with an Interactive Simulation
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Studies to Determine User Requirements Regarding In-Home Monitoring Systems
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Improving Tensor Based Recommenders with Clustering
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Models of User Engagement
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Improving the Performance of Unit Critiquing
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Enhanced Semantic TV-Show Representation for Personalized Electronic Program Guides
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Attention and Selection in Online Choice Tasks
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Investigating Explanations to Justify Choice
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 The Effect of Suspicious Profiles on People Recommenders
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Users and Noise: The Magic Barrier of Recommender Systems
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Improving Construct Validity Yields Better Models of Systematic Inquiry, Even with Less Information
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Inferring Personality of Online Gamers by Fusing Multiple-View Predictions
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Towards Adaptive Information Visualization: On the Influence of User Characteristics
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 WTF? detecting students who are conducting inquiry without thinking fastidiously
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 A Multi-faceted User Model for Twitter
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Evaluating Rating Scales Personality
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Automating the Modeling of Learners’ Erroneous Behaviors in Model-Tracing Tutors
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Using Touch as a Predictor of Effort: What the iPad Can Tell Us about User Affective State
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization
  32. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 31 User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization
  33. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 32 Adaptive Score Reports
  34. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 33 Improving Matrix Factorization Techniques of Student Test Data with Partial Order Constraints
  35. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 34 Evaluating an Implementation of an Adaptive Game-Based Learning Architecture
  36. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 35 Towards a Generic Model for User Assistance
  37. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 36 Resolving Data Sparsity and Cold Start in Recommender Systems
  38. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 37 Data Mining for Adding Adaptive Interventions to Exploratory and Open-Ended Environments
  39. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 38 Formalising Human Mental Workload as Non-monotonic Concept for Adaptive and Personalised Web-Design
  40. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 39 Detecting, Acquiring and Exploiting Contextual Information in Personalized Services
  41. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 40 Multi-source Provenance-aware User Interest Profiling on the Social Semantic Web
  42. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 41 User Feedback and Preferences Mining
  43. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 42 Ubiquitous Fuzzy User Modeling for Multi-application Environments by Mining Socially Enhanced Online Traces
  44. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 43 Facilitating Code Example Search on the Web through Expertise Personalization
Attention for Chapter 8: A Comparative Study of Users’ Microblogging Behavior on Sina Weibo and Twitter
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A Comparative Study of Users’ Microblogging Behavior on Sina Weibo and Twitter
Chapter number 8
Book title
User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-31454-4_8
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-231453-7, 978-3-64-231454-4
Authors

Qi Gao, Fabian Abel, Geert-Jan Houben, Yong Yu, Gao, Qi, Abel, Fabian, Houben, Geert-Jan, Yu, Yong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 3 1%
Australia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 198 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 25%
Student > Master 45 22%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Researcher 14 7%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 35 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 66 32%
Social Sciences 38 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 17 8%
Arts and Humanities 10 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 3%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 43 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,384,776
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#1,693
of 8,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,819
of 244,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#99
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.