You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparing the environmental efficiency of milk and beef production through life cycle assessment of interconnected cattle systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cleaner Production, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124108 |
| Authors |
Andre M. Mazzetto, George Bishop, David Styles, Claudia Arndt, Robert Brook, Dave Chadwick |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 3 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Slovakia | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 64% |
| Scientists | 9 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Professor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 48 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 10% |
| Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,033,809
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cleaner Production
#684
of 9,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,066
of 518,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cleaner Production
#35
of 386 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 386 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.