You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mixing messages: How candidates vary in their use of Twitter
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Information Technology & Politics, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1080/19331681.2020.1814929 |
| Authors |
Jeremy Gelman, Steven Lloyd Wilson, Constanza Sanhueza Petrarca |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 43 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 14 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 44 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2020.
All research outputs
#6,747,155
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Technology & Politics
#197
of 426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,831
of 426,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Technology & Politics
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.