| Title |
Modeling the Cost-effectiveness of Strategies for Treating Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and High-grade Dysplasia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11605-012-1911-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Louisa G. Gordon, Nicholas G. Hirst, George C. Mayne, David I. Watson, Timothy Bright, Wang Cai, Andrew P. Barbour, Bernard M. Smithers, David C. Whiteman, Simon Eckermann, Australian Cancer Study Clinical Follow-Up Study |
| Abstract |
This study aims to synthesize cost and health outcomes for current treatment pathways for esophageal adenocarcinoma and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and to model comparative net clinical and economic benefits of alternative management scenarios. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 21% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 53% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#599
of 2,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,822
of 178,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,485 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.