| Title |
Mechanisms in neurogenic stress cardiomyopathy after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurocritical Care, January 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1385/ncc:5:3:243 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vivien H. Lee, Jae K. Oh, Sharon L. Mulvagh, Eelco F. M. Wijdicks |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 25% |
| Unknown | 27 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 59% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 32 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,048,105
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Neurocritical Care
#269
of 1,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,445
of 178,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurocritical Care
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.