↓ Skip to main content

Changes in daily leptin, ghrelin and adiponectin profiles following a diet with carbohydrates eaten at dinner in obese subjects

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 1,949)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
60 X users
facebook
24 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Changes in daily leptin, ghrelin and adiponectin profiles following a diet with carbohydrates eaten at dinner in obese subjects
Published in
Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, August 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.numecd.2012.04.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Sofer, A. Eliraz, S. Kaplan, H. Voet, G. Fink, T. Kima, Z. Madar

Abstract

Our recently published randomised clinical trial evaluated the effect of a low-calorie diet with carbohydrates eaten at dinner. This dietary pattern led to lower hunger scores, and better anthropometric, biochemical and inflammatory outcomes compared to a standard low-calorie diet. In the same study, changes in diurnal secretion patterns of leptin, ghrelin and adiponectin were investigated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 119 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 20%
Student > Bachelor 22 18%
Researcher 12 10%
Other 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 28 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 14%
Sports and Recreations 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 34 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2022.
All research outputs
#456,276
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
#41
of 1,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,247
of 186,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.