You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A horizon scanning assessment of current and potential future threats to migratory shorebirds
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ibis, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1111/j.1474-919x.2012.01261.x |
Authors |
William J. Sutherland, Jose A. Alves, Tatsuya Amano, Charlotte H. Chang, Nicholas C. Davidson, C. Max Finlayson, Jennifer A. Gill, Robert E. Gill, Patricia M. González, Tómas Grétar Gunnarsson, David Kleijn, Chris J. Spray, Tamás Székely, Des B. A. Thompson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 14 | 25% |
United States | 6 | 11% |
Australia | 2 | 4% |
France | 2 | 4% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
Morocco | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Iceland | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 24 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 48 | 86% |
Scientists | 5 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 3% |
United States | 4 | 1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Portugal | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 2% |
Unknown | 289 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 76 | 24% |
Student > Master | 56 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 27 | 9% |
Other | 24 | 8% |
Other | 30 | 9% |
Unknown | 56 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 128 | 41% |
Environmental Science | 89 | 28% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
Other | 17 | 5% |
Unknown | 58 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#841,243
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ibis
#147
of 3,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,431
of 190,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ibis
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.